Private vs public company valuations; why are they different? For public companies trading on a stock market such as the NYSE, analysts express the value of a company as a multiple of earnings. It is called the price-earnings ratio or PE ratio. If the price of a stock is trading at a low multiple (say six times earnings) and its prospects are strong, it would be good value; at 50 times earnings that same company would probably be expensive.
Private vs Public Company
For private companies we typically look at a multiple of EBITDA. Let’s say a company has been valued at $20 million and it can sustainably generate $5 million in EBITDA per year; then it is valued at four times EBITDA. As I noted earlier, four times EBITDA is equivalent to generating a 25% pre-tax return on capital per year; more if cheaper debt is used to lever the equity (for an explanation of this see my “What Will a Financial Buyer Pay?” post).
The Risk Return Curve
How do you decide if that is a proper risk adjusted rate of return for your capital? Risk adjusted is the key concept here. To figure this out we have to start at the risk-free rate and build on layers of risk to see where comparable assets should be priced. The risk free rate is the rate required for the most secure assets possible. The proxy for this is typically federal governments. They can print money at will so you can be assured you will get your money back (what it will be worth is another matter). Countries such as Canada, Germany, Austria, and the Netherlands are rated AAA by S&P and are as close to risk free as you can get and therefore set the proxy.
Let’s say the 10 year risk free rate is 3%. What is the next bucket of riskier assets? State bonds, Municipal bonds, AAA corporate debt, AAA preferred shares? All riskier, but lets jump straight to S&P 500 equity. What is the risk premium of a top tier, multi-billion dollar S&P 500 company? About 5% to 7% (note: even within the S&P 500, there are riskier subgroups. i.e. cyclicals vs. consumer staples). Adding this risk premium to the risk free rate, you get approximately 10%. So back to my introduction, buying a S&P stock at 10 times earnings may very well achieve a proper risk adjusted return.
The concept of the risk-return curve is that it measures the risk premium required for riskier assets. The idea is that you should be indifferent between different asset classes on the curve because you are being properly compensated for the additional risk.
A Risk Premium Lowers the Value of Small Private Companies
Intuitively, it makes sense that a small private company is riskier than a S&P 500 company but what are the specific drivers of this? A small private company typically has fewer customers, more customer concentration, comparatively a less established brand, a limited R&D budget, less access to funding sources (be it banks or equity investors) and much less liquidity for the holders of its equity to name a few key drivers and, as such it is riskier than an S&P 500 company.
So is four times EBITDA a fair value for a small private vs public company? It could be, but it depends on many company specific risk-return factors such as its growth prospects, the nature of its revenues (highly recurring or project based) and the size and diversity of its customer base.
Recommended Further Reading
For more on valuation as it relates to revenue quality and quality of earnings, see: Revenue Quality: What Does it Really Mean?
For more on normalization and EBITDA adjustments, see: Normalization Adjustments to Arrive at Adjusted EBITDA for Private Companies